H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 3-1

Marcelo Rios holds a 3–1 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2002 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcelo Rios
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 17, 2002* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Marcelo Rios #23 6-3 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #22 Match data
Oct 17, 2001* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Marcelo Rios #46 4-6 6-1 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #19 Match data
May 15, 1997* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Marcelo Rios #9 6-2 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #56 Match data
May 3, 1997* Prague ATP 250 QF Clay Fabrice Santoro #69 4-6 6-3 6-0 Marcelo Rios #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,137 366 179 67.2% 0 5 1 0 12 18
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,769 0 3 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,835 0 4 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,868 0 5 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,948 0 12 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,916 0 15 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2000 28–19 59.6% #37 1,813 0 16 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,836 0 18 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,809 0 18 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6