H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Fernando Meligeni H2H: 3-0
Marcelo Rios holds a 3–0 lead over Fernando Meligeni in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2002 Washington quarterfinal 3-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2002* | Washington | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1997* | Santiago | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 1-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1996* | Santiago | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 6-3 6-2 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Fernando Meligeni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |