H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Gaston Gaudio H2H: 4-0
Marcelo Rios holds a 4–0 lead over Gaston Gaudio in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2003 Indian Wells Masters second round 4-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2003* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 4-0 (ret.) | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2003* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 6-3 6-2 | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
| Oct 16, 2002* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-2 6-2 | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2002* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-3 6-2 | Gaston Gaudio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Gaston Gaudio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 |