H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 1-1

Marcelo Rios and Gianluca Pozzi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gianluca Pozzi leads 1–0 on grass, while Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2001 Qatar Open round of 16 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcelo Rios
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcelo Rios #37 6-2 6-2 Gianluca Pozzi #43 Match data Jan 5, 2001* R16 Qatar Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Gianluca Pozzi #59 3-6 6-4 6-0 Marcelo Rios #2 Match data Jun 18, 1998* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,129 366 180 67.0% 0 5 1 2 10 18
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 173 258 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Gianluca Pozzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,770 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,837 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,869 0 5 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,963 0 12 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,918 0 15 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0
24 2000 28–20 58.3% #37 1,796 0 16 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,531 0 0
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,839 0 18 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,459 0 0
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,822 0 18 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,560 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,608 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,555 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,602 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2000 27–23 54.0% #43 1,724 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,494 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcelo Rios Gianluca Pozzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 24 9 33 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 18 10 28 64.3% 28 10 38 73.7% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 23 11 34 67.6% 23 9 32 71.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1998 33 9 42 78.6% 23 5 28 82.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1999 20 8 28 71.4% 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2001 23 11 34 67.6% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2002 25 11 36 69.4% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 2003 6 3 9 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1992 17 18 35 48.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 3 11 14 21.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 11 14 25 44.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 12 14 26 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 12 18 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 172 84 256 67.2% 164 74 238 68.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 26 16 42 61.9% — 105 149 254 41.3% 6 34 40 15.0% 32 36 68 47.1% 30 39 69 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcelo Rios Gianluca Pozzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1994 1616 137.6 +0.45 +1.49 1.032 50.6% -52 +21 — 55.0% +0.22 3–7 (30%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1771 143.6 +2.61 +2.16 1.134 52.1% -64 +64 -204 62.1% +0.70 11–6 (65%) 15–7 (68%) — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 1838 152.6 +2.05 +2.33 1.101 51.6% -34 +60 — 61.9% +0.60 14–6 (70%) 18–8 (69%) — +2.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1870 152.1 +2.50 +1.54 1.103 51.7% +18 +34 -203 62.1% +0.79 18–8 (69%) 16–20 (44%) — +2.15 1986 1480 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.06
22 1998 1963 161.2 +5.86 +6.49 1.429 55.9% +47 +47 — 74.9% +1.61 6–7 (46%) 13–6 (68%) — +0.31 1987 1501 105.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.25 — — — -0.04
23 1999 1918 149.7 +1.16 +3.33 1.141 52.4% +10 +119 — 68.0% +0.95 13–3 (81%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.91 1988 1508 113.8 — — — — +65 — — 33.3% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.72
24 2000 1797 147.3 +2.03 +1.16 1.090 51.4% +20 +166 — 61.5% +0.77 7–9 (44%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.74 1989 1532 111.7 — — — — +42 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01
25 2001 1839 143.7 +1.20 +2.08 1.095 51.6% +26 -19 — 57.9% +0.52 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.04 1990 1460 99.5 — — — — +55 — — 22.7% -2.14 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +0.74
26 2002 1820 149.1 +0.99 +1.31 1.023 50.6% +48 -37 — 63.5% +0.74 7–5 (58%) 14–10 (58%) — +0.28 1991 1697 135.0 — — — — +11 — -143 52.8% +0.04 6–6 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.02
27 2003 1823 138.3 +2.95 +4.36 1.313 55.0% +78 -41 — 69.7% +1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.79 1992 1709 135.4 — — — — +34 -217 -129 46.6% -0.12 17–7 (71%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.05
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1560 119.9 — — — — +30 — +12 35.1% -1.37 7–7 (50%) 11–4 (73%) — -1.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1608 117.5 — — — — +43 — -94 40.5% -0.71 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.46
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1555 119.8 — — — — +23 — +2 35.1% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1531 114.7 — — — — +18 — +61 37.3% -0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1509 109.9 — — — — +20 — — 31.8% -1.36 1–1 2–0 — +0.87
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1654 134.1 — — — — +15 -252 -36 46.2% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1602 130.9 — — — — +37 -205 +16 41.8% -0.45 6–11 (35%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1725 134.1 — — — — -41 -313 +22 50.8% +0.11 12–8 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.12
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 121.1 — — — — +82 -133 +119 28.8% -1.23 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.16
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1486 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2130 155.6 +2.44 +2.75 1.148 52.4% +15 +57 -203 64.3% +0.85 88–58 (60%) 121–76 (61%) 107.0 +1.12 — 1784 130.8 — — — — +26 -227 -13 41.5% -0.58 69–75 (48%) 67–61 (52%) 104.3 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.