H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 1-1
Marcelo Rios and Gianluca Pozzi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gianluca Pozzi leads 1–0 on grass, while Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2001 Doha fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2001* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-2 6-2 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1998* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Gianluca Pozzi | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 172 | 257 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Gianluca Pozzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |