H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 3-1
Marcelo Rios holds a 3–1 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2002 Stockholm fourth round 6-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2002* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-2 (ret.) | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| May 17, 2001* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-3 6-4 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
| Oct 16, 1999* | Singapore | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-4 6-4 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1998* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |