H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 4-1

Marcelo Rios holds a 4–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1998 Lyon third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcelo Rios
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 22, 1998* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Marcelo Rios #2 6-3 6-3 Jeff Tarango #71 Match data
Aug 23, 1997* Boston ATP 250 SF Hard Marcelo Rios #10 6-4 6-3 Jeff Tarango #60 Match data
Mar 19, 1997* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Marcelo Rios #9 7-5 6-2 Jeff Tarango #72 Match data
Jan 10, 1997* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard Marcelo Rios #11 6-2 6-4 Jeff Tarango #92 Match data
Aug 30, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jeff Tarango #104 6-4 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Marcelo Rios #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,137 366 179 67.2% 0 5 1 0 12 18
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,769 0 3 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,835 0 4 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,868 0 5 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,948 0 12 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,916 0 15 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 2000 28–19 59.6% #37 1,813 0 16 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,836 0 18 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,809 0 18 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2