H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Jonas Bjorkman H2H: 3-1
Marcelo Rios holds a 3–1 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2002 US Open first round 1-6 6-2 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 1-6 6-2 6-4 6-1 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1999* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-4 6-1 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1997* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-3 7-5 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1997* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Jonas Bjorkman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 |