H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Jonas Bjorkman H2H: 3-1

Marcelo Rios holds a 3–1 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2002 US Open round of 128 1-6 6-2 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcelo Rios
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcelo Rios #22 1-6 6-2 6-4 6-1 Jonas Bjorkman #50 Match data Aug 28, 2002* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Marcelo Rios #7 6-4 6-1 Jonas Bjorkman #63 Match data Oct 9, 1999* SF Shanghai Masters ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Marcelo Rios #11 6-3 7-5 Jonas Bjorkman #25 Match data Aug 6, 1997* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jonas Bjorkman #29 6-3 3-6 6-1 Marcelo Rios #9 Match data Mar 20, 1997* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,129 366 180 67.0% 0 5 1 2 10 18
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,037 395 344 53.5% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Jonas Bjorkman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,770 0 3 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,837 0 4 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,869 0 5 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,963 0 12 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,918 0 15 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,726 0 0
24 2000 28–20 58.3% #37 1,796 0 16 1996 23–25 47.9% #69 1,706 0 0
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,839 0 18 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,007 0 3
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,822 0 18 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,746 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,777 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,735 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,833 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2004 19–25 43.2% #70 1,680 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,743 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,657 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2008 7–13 35.0% #172 1,645 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcelo Rios Jonas Bjorkman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 24 9 33 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1996 18 10 28 64.3% 28 10 38 73.7% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1997 23 11 34 67.6% 23 9 32 71.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1998 33 9 42 78.6% 23 5 28 82.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1994 17 14 31 54.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 1999 20 8 28 71.4% 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 23 14 37 62.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
24 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 13 16 29 44.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2001 23 11 34 67.6% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1997 45 13 58 77.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 2002 25 11 36 69.4% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 22 15 37 59.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2003 6 3 9 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1999 18 16 34 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 19 18 37 51.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 15 16 31 48.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 13 12 25 52.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 172 84 256 67.2% 164 74 238 68.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 26 16 42 61.9% — 237 203 440 53.9% 33 56 89 37.1% 79 44 123 64.2% 46 41 87 52.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/546 of Marcelo Rios's and 657/739 of Jonas Bjorkman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marcelo Rios Jonas Bjorkman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1994 20/23 3.7 2.1 60.5% 65.5% 52.6% 49.4% 48.5% 60.1% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 55/58 3.1 2.0 62.5% 69.4% 55.4% 59.3% 44.6% 64.1% 40.7% 1991 1/1 0.0 1.0 45.3% 54.2% 37.9% 58.3% 100.0% 45.3% 26.8%
20 1996 69/77 4.3 2.7 52.3% 73.2% 53.0% 54.8% 48.7% 63.5% 40.2% 1992 1/1 1.0 1.0 40.5% 64.7% 36.0% 33.3% 0.0% 47.6% 26.7%
21 1997 62/80 5.2 3.1 54.3% 71.9% 53.9% 58.8% 43.0% 63.7% 40.0% 1993 12/14 3.3 5.7 53.3% 70.4% 44.2% 53.0% 46.1% 58.0% 41.6%
22 1998 69/84 4.8 2.1 59.2% 76.8% 57.1% 63.8% 47.6% 68.7% 44.8% 1994 48/57 4.0 5.1 54.7% 72.4% 45.8% 57.0% 39.3% 60.2% 41.3%
23 1999 51/61 3.8 3.6 55.5% 70.9% 53.9% 56.5% 43.7% 63.2% 42.0% 1995 53/61 3.9 3.7 53.5% 70.4% 48.2% 50.9% 40.9% 60.2% 41.2%
24 2000 43/48 6.1 3.8 55.1% 72.7% 53.6% 62.1% 42.8% 64.1% 39.2% 1996 45/48 3.8 3.9 57.8% 69.7% 48.4% 55.4% 37.1% 60.6% 40.2%
25 2001 39/47 5.2 3.2 58.4% 72.0% 51.3% 60.6% 48.9% 63.3% 40.2% 1997 71/91 4.4 3.2 54.3% 73.1% 52.2% 61.0% 45.1% 63.6% 43.1%
26 2002 41/50 5.9 2.9 60.8% 70.2% 51.2% 59.0% 50.6% 62.7% 38.1% 1998 50/58 3.9 3.3 58.0% 68.9% 49.5% 57.2% 46.1% 60.7% 41.5%
27 2003 17/18 3.5 2.1 65.0% 73.6% 52.4% 56.3% 39.8% 66.5% 44.1% 1999 40/45 3.1 3.2 57.7% 67.0% 51.0% 59.8% 41.9% 60.4% 40.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 46/55 3.9 2.8 62.5% 70.9% 53.0% 57.5% 42.1% 64.3% 39.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 41/47 3.0 3.2 58.7% 67.8% 49.0% 60.0% 37.4% 60.2% 40.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 36/42 4.9 2.9 57.9% 71.7% 52.5% 60.1% 39.4% 63.5% 39.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 45/49 5.5 2.9 58.3% 74.8% 51.7% 69.0% 50.0% 65.1% 38.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 43/44 5.6 3.3 56.2% 70.6% 51.2% 56.5% 32.2% 62.3% 35.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 39/39 4.4 3.7 54.6% 71.4% 51.7% 55.7% 42.0% 62.6% 40.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 31/31 4.2 3.4 59.9% 70.2% 47.9% 47.9% 39.1% 61.1% 36.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 36/36 4.4 3.1 61.3% 68.3% 48.4% 66.0% 42.1% 60.5% 38.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 19/20 3.7 2.6 58.3% 70.5% 45.7% 49.7% 46.3% 60.6% 33.8%
Career — 466/546 4.6 2.8 57.5% 72.1% 53.8% 58.7% 46.1% 64.3% 41.0% — 657/739 4.2 3.4 57.2% 70.6% 49.8% 57.9% 41.6% 61.7% 39.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcelo Rios Jonas Bjorkman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1994 1616 137.6 +0.45 +1.49 1.032 50.6% -52 +21 — 55.0% +0.22 3–7 (30%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1771 143.6 +2.61 +2.16 1.134 52.1% -64 +64 -204 62.1% +0.70 11–6 (65%) 15–7 (68%) — +0.33 1991 1496 104.2 -1.46 -0.66 0.490 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.17
20 1996 1838 152.6 +2.05 +2.33 1.101 51.6% -34 +60 — 61.9% +0.60 14–6 (70%) 18–8 (69%) — +2.50 1992 1489 100.9 -1.75 +1.16 0.509 36.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02
21 1997 1870 152.1 +2.50 +1.54 1.103 51.7% +18 +34 -203 62.1% +0.79 18–8 (69%) 16–20 (44%) — +2.15 1993 1559 126.9 -2.47 +3.06 0.990 49.7% +42 — — 45.2% -0.39 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.04
22 1998 1963 161.2 +5.86 +6.49 1.429 55.9% +47 +47 — 74.9% +1.61 6–7 (46%) 13–6 (68%) — +0.31 1994 1752 141.1 -1.19 +3.27 1.037 50.4% -19 -167 -55 51.7% +0.25 12–7 (63%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.47
23 1999 1918 149.7 +1.16 +3.33 1.141 52.4% +10 +119 — 68.0% +0.95 13–3 (81%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.91 1995 1727 144.5 -1.62 +2.91 1.034 50.1% +48 -136 -62 54.8% +0.21 11–10 (52%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.57
24 2000 1797 147.3 +2.03 +1.16 1.090 51.4% +20 +166 — 61.5% +0.77 7–9 (44%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.74 1996 1706 138.7 -0.83 +2.45 1.021 50.2% -1 -32 -43 50.7% +0.09 9–13 (41%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.41
25 2001 1839 143.7 +1.20 +2.08 1.095 51.6% +26 -19 — 57.9% +0.52 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.04 1997 2007 158.3 +1.45 +5.73 1.183 53.1% +37 -327 -297 67.1% +1.05 13–9 (59%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.40
26 2002 1820 149.1 +0.99 +1.31 1.023 50.6% +48 -37 — 63.5% +0.74 7–5 (58%) 14–10 (58%) — +0.28 1998 1874 148.6 -0.77 +3.53 1.056 51.1% +16 -202 -75 57.2% +0.41 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.24
27 2003 1823 138.3 +2.95 +4.36 1.313 55.0% +78 -41 — 69.7% +1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.79 1999 1747 143.3 -0.90 +2.45 1.021 50.3% +59 -134 +15 49.6% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.35
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1777 137.7 +1.95 +1.81 1.092 51.6% -17 -188 +73 51.8% +0.35 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1736 138.2 -1.27 +2.62 1.013 50.3% -6 -195 +85 51.8% -0.05 4–9 (31%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.20
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1749 145.8 +1.10 +2.01 1.068 51.0% +17 -277 +105 50.0% +0.10 5–8 (38%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.63
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1834 142.2 +2.29 +1.49 1.106 51.9% -30 -284 +79 57.1% +0.58 6–3 (67%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.40
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1681 133.1 -0.67 -0.20 0.932 48.8% +15 -142 +166 43.2% -0.35 9–6 (60%) 7–14 (33%) — -1.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1744 132.0 -0.19 +2.61 1.076 51.0% -2 — +95 48.9% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.47
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1678 123.4 -1.15 -0.31 0.946 48.8% -99 — +317 44.7% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.04
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1658 132.4 -2.28 +1.93 0.983 50.2% -111 -113 +323 48.6% +0.03 7–7 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.58
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1645 125.3 -0.81 -2.46 0.858 47.1% -25 -106 +251 34.7% -0.92 4–2 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.13
Career — 2130 155.6 +2.44 +2.75 1.148 52.4% +15 +57 -203 64.3% +0.85 88–58 (60%) 121–76 (61%) 107.0 +1.12 — 2037 147.3 -0.26 +2.40 1.039 50.6% +5 -178 +71 52.5% +0.20 113–114 (50%) 123–120 (51%) 97.3 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.