H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 2-1
Marcelo Rios holds a 2–1 lead over Jonathan Stark in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jonathan Stark leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1997 Boston third round 6-7(1) 6-2 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1997* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-7(1) 6-2 7-6(1) | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1996* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1995* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jonathan Stark | 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Jonathan Stark | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |