H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Karim Alami H2H: 3-1
Marcelo Rios holds a 3–1 lead over Karim Alami in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Marcelo Rios leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karim Alami won the 2001 Vina Del Mar third round 7-6(1) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2001* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Karim Alami | 7-6(1) 6-2 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2000* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | Karim Alami | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1997* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-2 6-3 | Karim Alami | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1995* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 6-1 6-2 | Karim Alami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Karim Alami | #1,418 | #25 | 1,196 | 1,798 | 140 | 177 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Karim Alami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #73 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #56 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1997 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #55 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1999 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 2000 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #203 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #479 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |