H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Kenneth Carlsen H2H: 5-1

Marcelo Rios holds a 5–1 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Kenneth Carlsen leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2002 Canada Masters second round 7-6(5) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcelo Rios
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 2002* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Marcelo Rios #27 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Kenneth Carlsen #109 Match data
Sep 28, 2001* Hong Kong ATP 250 R16 Hard Marcelo Rios #58 7-5 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #182 Match data
Jan 17, 1998* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard Marcelo Rios #10 5-7 6-4 6-1 Kenneth Carlsen #96 Match data
Aug 29, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Marcelo Rios #10 6-4 5-7 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) Kenneth Carlsen #92 Match data
Jun 19, 1997* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Kenneth Carlsen #93 6-4 6-2 Marcelo Rios #10 Match data
Aug 22, 1996* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Marcelo Rios #11 6-3 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,137 366 179 67.2% 0 5 1 0 12 18
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Kenneth Carlsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,769 0 3 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,835 0 4 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,868 0 5 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,948 0 12 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,916 0 15 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0
24 2000 28–19 59.6% #37 1,813 0 16 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,836 0 18 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,809 0 18 — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3