H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-2
Marcelo Rios and Lleyton Hewitt are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2001 Scottsdale quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2001* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 7-5 6-2 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2000* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 7-6(5) 4-2 (ret.) | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
| Oct 16, 1999* | Singapore | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 7-5 6-3 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1998* | Singapore | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Marcelo Rios | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Lleyton Hewitt | #636 | #1 | 5,205 | 2,159 | 564 | 241 | 70.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 30 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Lleyton Hewitt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #100 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 53–15 | 77.9% | #7 | 1,993 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #1 | 2,116 | 1 | 12 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 61–16 | 79.2% | #1 | 2,062 | 2 | 17 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #17 | 1,939 | 2 | 19 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 2004 | 64–16 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,076 | 2 | 23 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 2005 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 24 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 2006 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #20 | 1,964 | 2 | 25 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 2007 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #21 | 1,925 | 2 | 26 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 2008 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #67 | 1,936 | 2 | 26 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #22 | 1,956 | 2 | 27 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #54 | 1,907 | 2 | 28 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #186 | 1,817 | 2 | 28 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #83 | 1,867 | 2 | 28 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,884 | 2 | 28 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,841 | 2 | 30 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,715 | 2 | 30 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #633 | 1,727 | 2 | 30 |