H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Magnus Larsson H2H: 4-3

Marcelo Rios holds a 4–3 lead over Magnus Larsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Magnus Larsson leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Marcelo Rios leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1998 US Open third round 6-1 6-7(3) 2-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcelo Rios
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Magnus Larsson
SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 6, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Magnus Larsson #34 6-1 6-7(3) 2-6 6-3 6-2 Marcelo Rios #2 Match data
May 17, 1997* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Marcelo Rios #9 4-6 7-5 6-4 Magnus Larsson #41 Match data
Apr 27, 1997* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Marcelo Rios #10 6-2 6-1 Magnus Larsson #43 Match data
Mar 13, 1997* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Magnus Larsson #49 6-3 5-7 7-6(2) Marcelo Rios #7 Match data
Feb 15, 1997* Marseille ATP 250 QF Hard Marcelo Rios #7 3-6 7-5 6-4 Magnus Larsson #46 Match data
Oct 19, 1996* Toulouse ATP 250 SF Hard Magnus Larsson #54 6-4 6-4 Marcelo Rios #10 Match data
Apr 20, 1996* Barcelona ATP 250 QF Clay Marcelo Rios #16 2-6 6-1 6-2 Magnus Larsson #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,137 366 179 67.2% 0 5 1 0 12 18
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,040 293 217 57.5% 0 0 1 0 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Magnus Larsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,769 0 3 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,835 0 4 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,868 0 5 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,718 0 1
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,948 0 12 1992 27–19 58.7% #34 1,802 0 3
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,916 0 15 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,820 0 3
24 2000 28–19 59.6% #37 1,813 0 16 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,004 0 6
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,836 0 18 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,932 0 6
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,765 0 6
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,809 0 18 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,891 0 6
28 — — — — — — — 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,828 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,729 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,770 0 7
31 — — — — — — — 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,728 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,673 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,689 0 7