H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Mark Knowles H2H: 1-1
Marcelo Rios and Mark Knowles are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Knowles leads 1–0 on grass, while Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1996 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1996* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Mark Knowles | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Mark Knowles | 4-6 6-3 6-4 7-6(4) | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Mark Knowles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |