H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 4-2

Marcelo Rios holds a 4–2 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Marcelo Rios leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2000 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcelo Rios
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Mark Philippoussis
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 10, 2000* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mark Philippoussis #18 6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(4) Marcelo Rios #20 Match data
Apr 25, 1999* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Marcelo Rios #13 6-2 6-7(2) 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #8 Match data
Oct 3, 1998* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals SF Hard Marcelo Rios #3 7-6(4) 6-3 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #15 Match data
Feb 21, 1998* Memphis ATP 250 SF Hard Mark Philippoussis #16 6-4 7-6(5) Marcelo Rios #7 Match data
Oct 8, 1995* Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 F Carpet Marcelo Rios #32 7-6(6) 6-2 Mark Philippoussis #90 Match data
May 27, 1995* Bologna ATP 250 SF Clay Marcelo Rios #69 6-4 7-6(6) Mark Philippoussis #131 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,137 366 179 67.2% 0 5 1 0 12 18
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Mark Philippoussis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,769 0 3 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,835 0 4 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,868 0 5 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,948 0 12 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,916 0 15 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8
24 2000 28–19 59.6% #37 1,813 0 16 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,836 0 18 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,809 0 18 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10
28 — — — — — — — 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11