H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 2-2
Marcelo Rios and Mark Woodforde are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 2–0 on carpet, while Mark Woodforde leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1998 Singapore final 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1998* | Singapore | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Marcelo Rios | 6-4 6-2 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1997* | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | R16 | Carpet | Marcelo Rios | 6-7 6-3 6-1 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1997 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1996* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 6-2 6-4 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |