H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 4-1

Marcelo Rios holds a 4–1 lead over Nicolas Escude in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2000 Hamburg Masters second round 6-4 6-1.

CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 50 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2000* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Marcelo Rios #20 6-4 6-1 Nicolas Escude #21 Match data
Mar 23, 2000* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Marcelo Rios #8 6-2 3-6 6-1 Nicolas Escude #28 Match data
Sep 8, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Nicolas Escude #136 6-2 6-3 7-5 Marcelo Rios #10 Match data
Oct 23, 1998* Lyon ATP 250 R16 Carpet Marcelo Rios #2 6-2 6-3 Nicolas Escude #31 Match data
Feb 1, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Marcelo Rios #8 6-1 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Escude #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,137 366 179 67.2% 0 5 1 0 12 18
Nicolas Escude #1,071 #17 1,357 1,909 157 124 55.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Nicolas Escude
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1993 0–1 0.0% #670 1,497 0 0
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,769 0 3 1995 1–2 33.3% #189 1,503 0 0
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,835 0 4
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,868 0 5 1997 6–6 50.0% #93 1,620 0 0
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,948 0 12 1998 22–22 50.0% #37 1,699 0 0
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,916 0 15 1999 19–15 55.9% #37 1,820 0 1
24 2000 28–19 59.6% #37 1,813 0 16 2000 26–22 54.2% #48 1,717 0 1
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,836 0 18 2001 28–23 54.9% #27 1,724 0 2
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 2002 29–15 65.9% #34 1,842 0 3
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,809 0 18 2003 11–10 52.4% #114 1,790 0 3
28 2004 15–8 65.2% #64 1,829 0 4