H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Robin Soderling H2H: 1-0
Marcelo Rios holds a 1–0 lead over Robin Soderling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2002 US Open second round 6-4 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 41
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-4 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Robin Soderling | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Robin Soderling | #195 | #4 | 6,055 | 2,172 | 285 | 166 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Robin Soderling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #444 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #163 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 2007 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 2008 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #17 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 2,070 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 2010 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #5 | 2,118 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 2011 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #13 | 2,127 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |