H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Sandon Stolle H2H: 2-0
Marcelo Rios holds a 2–0 lead over Sandon Stolle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1996 Scottsdale semifinal 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 1996* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-4 7-5 | Sandon Stolle | Match data |
| Oct 5, 1995* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marcelo Rios | 7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(2) | Sandon Stolle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Sandon Stolle | #1,379 | #50 | 810 | 1,745 | 100 | 120 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Sandon Stolle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #228 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #71 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #182 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1994 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1995 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #179 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1997 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #83 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #375 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |