H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Scott Draper H2H: 2-0
Marcelo Rios holds a 2–0 lead over Scott Draper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1999 Miami Masters second round 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1999* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Scott Draper | Match data |
| May 21, 1998* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 6-1 6-3 | Scott Draper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Scott Draper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |