H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 2-0
Marcelo Rios holds a 2–0 lead over Sebastien Lareau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1998 Singapore third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1998* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marcelo Rios | 6-2 6-0 | Sebastien Lareau | Match data |
| Oct 24, 1996* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Marcelo Rios | 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 | Sebastien Lareau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Sebastien Lareau | #1,018 | #76 | 622 | 1,719 | 82 | 120 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Sebastien Lareau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #119 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #105 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1997 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #187 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1999 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 2000 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #124 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #229 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |