H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Slava Dosedel H2H: 3-1
Marcelo Rios holds a 3–1 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2000 Gstaad third round 7-5 6-7(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2000* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 7-5 6-7(2) 6-2 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| May 25, 1996* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| May 11, 1996* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 6-3 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1995* | Santiago | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marcelo Rios | Slava Dosedel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 |