H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Tim Henman H2H: 3-2

Marcelo Rios holds a 3–2 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2000 Canada Masters second round 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcelo Rios
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 2, 2000* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Marcelo Rios #22 6-4 3-6 6-3 Tim Henman #17 Match data
Mar 25, 2000* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tim Henman #10 6-1 1-6 7-6(4) Marcelo Rios #8 Match data
Nov 23, 1998 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Tim Henman #9 7-5 6-1 Marcelo Rios #2 Match data
May 14, 1998* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Marcelo Rios #3 6-3 6-1 Tim Henman #17 Match data
Mar 22, 1998* Miami Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Marcelo Rios #3 6-2 4-6 6-0 Tim Henman #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,137 366 179 67.2% 0 5 1 0 12 18
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,769 0 3 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,835 0 4 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,868 0 5 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,948 0 12 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,916 0 15 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2000 28–19 59.6% #37 1,813 0 16 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,836 0 18 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,809 0 18 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11