H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 2-2
Marcelo Rios and Todd Woodbridge are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Todd Woodbridge leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1999 Shanghai quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1999* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-3 6-3 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Nov 5, 1998* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Marcelo Rios | 6-0 6-4 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1996* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 6-0 6-3 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1995* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 7-5 6-3 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |