H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 5-3

Marcelo Rios holds a 5–3 lead over Wayne Ferreira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 4–1 on clay, while Wayne Ferreira leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2001 Roland Garros first round 3-6 6-4 3-6 6-4 6-1.

CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 30, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Marcelo Rios #39 3-6 6-4 3-6 6-4 6-1 Wayne Ferreira #19 Match data
May 8, 1999* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Marcelo Rios #8 6-1 3-6 6-2 Wayne Ferreira #24 Match data
May 31, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Marcelo Rios #3 6-1 3-3 (ret.) Wayne Ferreira #30 Match data
May 7, 1998* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Wayne Ferreira #32 4-6 6-4 6-3 Marcelo Rios #3 Match data
May 12, 1996* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Marcelo Rios #11 3-6 6-4 6-4 Wayne Ferreira #10 Match data
Mar 17, 1996* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Marcelo Rios #20 7-5 7-5 Wayne Ferreira #10 Match data
Mar 10, 1996* Scottsdale ATP 250 F Hard Wayne Ferreira #10 2-6 6-3 6-3 Marcelo Rios #20 Match data
Sep 2, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Wayne Ferreira #13 6-4 6-2 6-4 Marcelo Rios #123 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,137 366 179 67.2% 0 5 1 0 12 18
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Wayne Ferreira
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,769 0 3 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,835 0 4 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,868 0 5 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,948 0 12 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,916 0 15 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11
24 2000 28–19 59.6% #37 1,813 0 16 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,836 0 18 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,809 0 18 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13
28 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14
30 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14
31 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15