H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Younes El Aynaoui H2H: 2-1
Marcelo Rios holds a 2–1 lead over Younes El Aynaoui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2002 Monte Carlo Masters third round 1-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 54
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2002* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Younes El Aynaoui | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1999* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Younes El Aynaoui | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
| May 22, 1999* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Marcelo Rios | 6-1 6-3 | Younes El Aynaoui | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Younes El Aynaoui | #1,592 | #14 | 1,635 | 1,923 | 243 | 219 | 52.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Younes El Aynaoui | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #311 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #51 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1996 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #25 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #22 | 1,773 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #644 | 1,739 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #228 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,610 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #201 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #720 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |