H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Marco Cecchinato vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-1

Marco Cecchinato and Lukas Lacko are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on grass, while Marco Cecchinato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marco Cecchinato won the 2018 St. Petersburg round of 16 7-5 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marco Cecchinato
Italy Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marco Cecchinato #22 7-5 7-6(6) Lukas Lacko #77 Match data Sep 21, 2018* R16 St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard
Lukas Lacko #94 6-3 6-4 Marco Cecchinato #31 Match data Jun 30, 2018* SF Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marco Cecchinato #166 #16 2,091 1,903 79 128 38.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marco Cecchinato Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2013 0–1 0.0% #163 1,587 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2014 0–3 0.0% #159 1,586 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2015 0–4 0.0% #90 1,556 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2016 2–10 16.7% #187 1,562 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2017 1–5 16.7% #109 1,559 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2018 23–23 50.0% #20 1,771 0 2 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2019 14–25 35.9% #71 1,644 0 3 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2020 8–13 38.1% #80 1,762 0 3 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2021 16–21 43.2% #100 1,680 0 3 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2022 4–7 36.4% #101 1,642 0 3 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2023 11–15 42.3% #198 1,609 0 3 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #166 1,557 0 3 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marco Cecchinato Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2014 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2017 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2018 4 11 15 26.7% 17 10 27 63.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2019 5 12 17 29.4% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2021 1 6 7 14.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 12 43 55 21.8% 65 76 141 46.1% 2 9 11 18.2% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 205/207 of Marco Cecchinato's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marco Cecchinato Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2013 1/1 2.0 1.0 71.8% 55.4% 50.0% 54.5% 60.0% 53.8% 42.5% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2014 3/3 2.3 2.3 60.7% 66.3% 48.6% 33.3% 22.9% 59.3% 34.1% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2015 4/4 4.5 3.5 61.2% 64.6% 42.1% 35.3% 59.0% 55.1% 28.4% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2016 12/12 2.4 1.9 63.1% 64.4% 47.6% 57.9% 25.6% 58.1% 30.5% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2017 6/6 2.3 3.3 66.4% 65.3% 37.7% 38.8% 24.6% 56.4% 34.3% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2018 46/46 5.4 2.6 68.4% 69.2% 48.7% 56.5% 36.6% 62.6% 34.4% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2019 37/39 4.8 2.7 63.6% 69.9% 49.6% 53.2% 45.5% 62.6% 34.9% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2020 21/21 4.7 2.3 66.3% 67.3% 50.4% 53.0% 36.5% 61.5% 34.0% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2021 37/37 4.2 2.6 66.8% 68.5% 51.2% 58.1% 35.7% 62.7% 36.6% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2022 11/11 2.3 2.0 66.1% 63.5% 45.4% 54.8% 37.9% 57.3% 33.6% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2023 26/26 3.7 2.8 60.5% 65.3% 50.8% 60.3% 47.8% 59.9% 33.2% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
33 2026 1/1 1.0 2.0 68.0% 53.0% 22.0% 29.0% 40.0% 43.0% 36.0% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
Career — 205/207 4.2 2.6 65.3% 67.6% 49.0% 54.9% 38.9% 61.1% 34.3% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marco Cecchinato Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1512 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2013 1587 115.3 +3.04 -2.45 0.920 48.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.19 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2014 1586 117.0 -0.42 -2.53 0.839 46.5% — +93 — 25.0% -1.25 0–2 1–1 — -0.24 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2015 1556 113.7 -2.52 -4.09 0.631 42.5% — — — 25.0% -2.00 0–2 1–0 — 0.00 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2016 1563 122.3 -2.06 -2.65 0.728 44.8% — +72 — 24.1% -1.76 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.78 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2017 1559 113.8 -1.75 -1.90 0.787 45.2% — +102 — 20.0% -1.74 1–1 0–2 — +0.15 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2018 1772 145.9 -0.08 -1.47 0.919 49.0% -301 +201 -151 47.1% -0.22 11–4 (73%) 13–11 (54%) — -0.46 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2019 1645 142.3 -0.33 -1.36 0.932 48.8% -133 +194 -84 38.0% -0.71 3–12 (20%) 8–11 (42%) — +0.50 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2020 1762 135.4 -0.70 -1.93 0.881 48.1% -218 +106 — 37.0% -0.54 4–2 (67%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.55 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2021 1681 131.3 -0.53 -0.56 0.983 49.8% -210 +142 — 45.3% -0.33 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.29 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2022 1643 117.9 -3.04 -2.10 0.787 46.4% — +100 — 34.5% -0.76 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.20 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2023 1610 118.7 -2.90 -2.81 0.827 47.5% -187 +81 — 41.7% -0.82 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.21 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2024 1576 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2025 1560 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1557 108.0 +1.67 -2.75 0.632 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1904 133.9 -0.98 -1.70 0.883 48.1% -210 +138 -122 39.6% -0.67 29–37 (44%) 45–40 (53%) 102.3 -0.69 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.