H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marco Cecchinato vs Norbert Gombos H2H: 1-1
Marco Cecchinato and Norbert Gombos are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marco Cecchinato leads 1–0 on clay, while Norbert Gombos leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marco Cecchinato won the 2021 Parma quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Slovakia
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2021* | Parma | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Marco Cecchinato | 6-3 6-1 | Norbert Gombos | Match data |
| Nov 4, 2020* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Norbert Gombos | 6-2 7-6(2) | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2014* | Umag | ATP 250 | Q3 | Clay | Marco Cecchinato | 6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | Norbert Gombos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Norbert Gombos | #370 | #80 | 912 | 1,794 | 22 | 46 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Cecchinato | Norbert Gombos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #132 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #88 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #118 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |