H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marco Trungelliti vs Elias Ymer H2H: 1-0
Marco Trungelliti holds a 1–0 lead over Elias Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marco Trungelliti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marco Trungelliti won the 2018 Istanbul third round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Sweden
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2024* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q2 | Grass | Elias Ymer | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | Marco Trungelliti | Match data |
| May 3, 2018* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marco Trungelliti | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Elias Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Trungelliti | #99 | #76 | 758 | 1,712 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elias Ymer | #183 | #105 | 534 | 1,696 | 29 | 68 | 29.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Trungelliti | Elias Ymer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #160 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #275 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #170 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #155 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #123 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |