H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Marco Trungelliti vs Marco Cecchinato H2H: 0-2
Marco Cecchinato holds a 2–0 lead over Marco Trungelliti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marco Cecchinato leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Marco Cecchinato won the 2018 Umag semifinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2018* | Umag | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Marco Cecchinato | 6-2 6-1 | Marco Trungelliti | Match data |
| May 31, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Marco Cecchinato | 6-1 7-6(1) 6-1 | Marco Trungelliti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Trungelliti | #99 | #76 | 758 | 1,712 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Trungelliti | Marco Cecchinato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #275 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2018 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #123 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |