H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Marcos Baghdatis vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 2-2

Marcos Baghdatis and Lukas Lacko are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2016 Montpellier Open first round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcos Baghdatis #53 7-5 7-5 Lukas Lacko #109 Match data Feb 4, 2016* R32 Montpellier Open ATP 250 Hard
Marcos Baghdatis #44 6-7(2) 6-2 6-4 Lukas Lacko #86 Match data Aug 1, 2013* R32 Washington Open ATP 500 Hard
Lukas Lacko #97 7-5 7-6(3) Marcos Baghdatis #45 Match data Feb 4, 2012* SF Zagreb ATP 250 Hard
Lukas Lacko #75 6-3 2-6 6-3 6-1 Marcos Baghdatis #27 Match data Jun 23, 2010* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 327 274 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 2–2 50.0% #159 1,576 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,699 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,938 0 2 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,814 0 2 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,784 0 3 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,851 0 4 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2012 33–25 56.9% #36 1,908 0 4 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,806 0 4 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,704 0 4 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,870 0 4 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,728 0 4 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,743 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2007 23 15 38 60.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2010 33 18 51 64.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 18 18 36 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2012 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2013 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2015 17 13 30 56.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 2019 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 233 182 415 56.1% 30 50 80 37.5% 55 40 95 57.9% 9 2 11 81.8% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 594/601 of Marcos Baghdatis's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 2/4 11.5 7.5 51.4% 71.0% 41.1% 18.3% 61.4% 56.3% 38.1% 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2005 23/23 7.5 2.6 56.7% 73.2% 52.6% 55.8% 51.8% 64.3% 37.5% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2006 53/53 7.4 3.3 52.5% 74.5% 50.5% 54.0% 44.4% 62.8% 40.2% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2007 66/66 6.8 2.7 52.6% 75.1% 54.2% 61.3% 46.5% 65.0% 39.2% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2008 24/24 8.2 3.8 54.0% 77.5% 53.3% 57.0% 35.8% 66.3% 35.2% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2009 33/34 7.2 3.0 52.8% 75.2% 51.2% 56.2% 43.9% 63.7% 39.4% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2010 68/68 7.3 2.9 51.3% 75.9% 52.1% 57.6% 43.5% 64.5% 38.6% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2011 53/53 7.5 2.9 51.3% 76.4% 51.0% 59.2% 46.0% 63.9% 36.7% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2012 55/58 6.3 3.1 54.7% 73.6% 52.4% 54.6% 43.1% 64.2% 37.9% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2013 36/36 7.6 4.3 53.0% 75.3% 51.9% 64.0% 39.1% 64.1% 34.4% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2014 18/18 6.4 4.6 52.0% 74.5% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 63.0% 35.2% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2015 45/45 7.8 3.6 54.5% 74.1% 51.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.6% 37.6% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2016 49/49 6.0 3.3 52.3% 73.9% 53.6% 58.4% 43.5% 64.0% 36.9% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2017 34/34 7.6 3.5 52.0% 76.6% 49.9% 62.7% 39.9% 64.1% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 28/29 9.6 3.5 56.0% 74.9% 50.9% 56.9% 37.7% 64.0% 38.1% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2019 7/7 5.7 4.1 55.2% 77.5% 46.0% 56.1% 43.2% 63.4% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 594/601 7.3 3.3 53.0% 75.0% 51.8% 57.6% 43.6% 64.1% 37.7% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2003 1485 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1576 118.7 -0.69 +1.61 0.871 47.4% +16 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 2–0 — -0.09 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2005 1700 138.3 +1.75 +0.83 1.048 50.7% +36 — — 49.3% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.74 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2006 1843 151.4 +0.96 +3.30 1.081 51.5% +9 -291 -70 59.3% +0.45 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) — -1.44 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2007 1938 150.2 +2.29 +2.86 1.121 52.1% -36 -250 -59 61.7% +0.72 13–6 (68%) 18–16 (53%) — -0.34 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2008 1814 141.8 +1.75 -0.01 1.045 50.5% +1 — +137 56.3% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.74 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2009 1785 147.9 +0.73 +2.59 1.086 51.4% +42 — +151 56.4% +0.42 1–6 (14%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.90 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2010 1852 156.2 +1.70 +2.21 1.087 51.3% +40 -122 -46 59.2% +0.51 12–11 (52%) 16–8 (67%) — -0.06 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2011 1844 157.1 +1.07 +0.51 1.016 50.4% +32 -159 +46 52.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) — -0.79 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2012 1908 155.9 +1.50 +1.16 1.059 50.9% +21 -225 +14 56.4% +0.32 9–6 (60%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.33 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2013 1806 154.0 +1.07 -0.98 0.959 49.3% +63 -182 +5 43.6% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.69 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2014 1705 123.0 -0.60 -0.13 0.951 48.8% +34 — +84 46.8% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.23 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2015 1870 152.8 -0.76 +2.30 1.033 50.6% -3 -251 -6 56.9% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.74 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2016 1884 158.0 +0.22 +1.50 1.027 50.2% +24 -227 -33 52.5% +0.08 6–7 (46%) 12–10 (55%) — -2.18 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2017 1839 144.1 +0.48 -0.05 1.011 50.1% +31 -215 -34 52.1% +0.15 6–1 (86%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.55 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1728 136.9 +0.05 +0.78 1.058 50.5% +55 -175 +46 43.8% -0.13 3–4 (43%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.39 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2019 1743 122.7 -0.99 +0.40 1.010 49.8% +39 — — 50.0% -0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.56 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1953 157.5 +0.97 +1.47 1.049 50.7% +23 -204 +4 54.6% +0.27 95–94 (50%) 147–125 (54%) 100.7 -1.90 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.