H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Marcos Baghdatis vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 2-0

Marcos Baghdatis holds a 2–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2013 Zagreb round of 32 6-7(6) 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Tobias Kamke
GER Age 40 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcos Baghdatis #36 6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 Tobias Kamke #89 Match data Feb 7, 2013* R32 Zagreb ATP 250 Hard
Marcos Baghdatis #39 6-1 3-6 6-3 Tobias Kamke #81 Match data May 3, 2012* R32 Munich Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 327 274 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Tobias Kamke #1,114 #64 744 1,766 62 101 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Tobias Kamke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 2–2 50.0% #159 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,699 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #210 1,502 0 0
22 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,938 0 2 2008 0–1 0.0% #243 1,508 0 0
23 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,814 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,784 0 3 2010 7–8 46.7% #67 1,639 0 0
25 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,851 0 4 2011 15–23 39.5% #96 1,738 0 0
26 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4 2012 6–18 25.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2012 33–25 56.9% #36 1,908 0 4 2013 17–21 44.7% #74 1,731 0 0
28 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,806 0 4 2014 9–16 36.0% #97 1,669 0 0
29 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,704 0 4 2015 1–5 16.7% #277 1,583 0 0
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,870 0 4 2016 5–5 50.0% #118 1,707 0 0
31 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4 2017 2–2 50.0% #233 1,617 0 0
32 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,728 0 4 2019 0–1 0.0% #242 1,566 0 0
34 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,743 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Tobias Kamke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 23 15 38 60.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2010 33 18 51 64.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
26 2011 18 18 36 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2012 5 11 16 31.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2013 10 11 21 47.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2013 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2014 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2015 17 13 30 56.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 2017 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 233 182 415 56.1% 30 50 80 37.5% 55 40 95 57.9% 9 2 11 81.8% — 35 61 96 36.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 594/601 of Marcos Baghdatis's and 163/163 of Tobias Kamke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Tobias Kamke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 2/4 11.5 7.5 51.4% 71.0% 41.1% 18.3% 61.4% 56.3% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 23/23 7.5 2.6 56.7% 73.2% 52.6% 55.8% 51.8% 64.3% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 53/53 7.4 3.3 52.5% 74.5% 50.5% 54.0% 44.4% 62.8% 40.2% 2007 1/1 0.0 6.0 47.2% 56.0% 35.7% 16.7% — 45.3% 17.6%
22 2007 66/66 6.8 2.7 52.6% 75.1% 54.2% 61.3% 46.5% 65.0% 39.2% 2008 1/1 3.0 11.0 58.3% 64.9% 45.3% 25.0% 33.3% 56.7% 30.1%
23 2008 24/24 8.2 3.8 54.0% 77.5% 53.3% 57.0% 35.8% 66.3% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 33/34 7.2 3.0 52.8% 75.2% 51.2% 56.2% 43.9% 63.7% 39.4% 2010 15/15 1.8 3.3 59.0% 65.8% 48.0% 56.5% 35.6% 58.8% 39.1%
25 2010 68/68 7.3 2.9 51.3% 75.9% 52.1% 57.6% 43.5% 64.5% 38.6% 2011 38/38 2.3 3.5 57.2% 65.9% 50.9% 55.5% 39.3% 59.5% 38.5%
26 2011 53/53 7.5 2.9 51.3% 76.4% 51.0% 59.2% 46.0% 63.9% 36.7% 2012 24/24 1.4 4.6 57.4% 61.6% 45.8% 47.2% 39.2% 54.8% 40.4%
27 2012 55/58 6.3 3.1 54.7% 73.6% 52.4% 54.6% 43.1% 64.2% 37.9% 2013 38/38 2.2 2.6 60.4% 66.9% 49.5% 60.7% 46.9% 60.0% 39.2%
28 2013 36/36 7.6 4.3 53.0% 75.3% 51.9% 64.0% 39.1% 64.1% 34.4% 2014 25/25 2.4 3.3 61.0% 66.2% 51.7% 60.8% 36.4% 60.4% 34.6%
29 2014 18/18 6.4 4.6 52.0% 74.5% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 63.0% 35.2% 2015 6/6 2.2 2.5 56.5% 61.9% 46.0% 38.6% 45.4% 54.5% 37.5%
30 2015 45/45 7.8 3.6 54.5% 74.1% 51.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.6% 37.6% 2016 10/10 1.0 3.1 61.2% 64.4% 50.3% 45.7% 44.5% 58.8% 39.3%
31 2016 49/49 6.0 3.3 52.3% 73.9% 53.6% 58.4% 43.5% 64.0% 36.9% 2017 4/4 2.3 3.5 57.0% 73.4% 51.3% 60.9% 58.5% 64.2% 39.7%
32 2017 34/34 7.6 3.5 52.0% 76.6% 49.9% 62.7% 39.9% 64.1% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 28/29 9.6 3.5 56.0% 74.9% 50.9% 56.9% 37.7% 64.0% 38.1% 2019 1/1 0.0 8.0 46.4% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 33.3% 54.5% 29.6%
34 2019 7/7 5.7 4.1 55.2% 77.5% 46.0% 56.1% 43.2% 63.4% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 594/601 7.3 3.3 53.0% 75.0% 51.8% 57.6% 43.6% 64.1% 37.7% — 163/163 2.0 3.4 58.8% 65.4% 49.3% 54.9% 41.0% 58.7% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcos Baghdatis Tobias Kamke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2003 1485 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1576 118.7 -0.69 +1.61 0.871 47.4% +16 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 2–0 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1700 138.3 +1.75 +0.83 1.048 50.7% +36 — — 49.3% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 8–8 (50%) 101.2 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1843 151.4 +0.96 +3.30 1.081 51.5% +9 -291 -70 59.3% +0.45 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) 105.9 -1.44 2007 1502 102.7 +1.52 -1.81 0.323 34.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07
22 2007 1938 150.2 +2.29 +2.86 1.121 52.1% -36 -250 -59 61.7% +0.72 13–6 (68%) 18–16 (53%) 107.4 -0.34 2008 1509 105.8 +1.11 -1.95 0.695 44.2% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.07
23 2008 1814 141.8 +1.75 -0.01 1.045 50.5% +1 — +137 56.3% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 7–3 (70%) 97.2 -0.74 2009 1457 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 1785 147.9 +0.73 +2.59 1.086 51.4% +42 — +151 56.4% +0.42 1–6 (14%) 5–7 (42%) 91.3 -0.90 2010 1639 126.8 -1.68 +1.56 0.949 48.8% -130 -61 +94 46.3% -0.29 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
25 2010 1852 156.2 +1.70 +2.21 1.087 51.3% +40 -122 -46 59.2% +0.51 12–11 (52%) 16–8 (67%) 103.7 -0.06 2011 1738 134.7 -2.56 +1.09 0.951 49.1% -78 -127 +18 42.4% -0.27 1–8 (11%) 3–9 (25%) 89.6 +0.04
26 2011 1844 157.1 +1.07 +0.51 1.016 50.4% +32 -159 +46 52.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) 97.1 -0.79 2012 1629 130.3 -5.44 +2.38 0.893 47.6% -3 -69 — 33.9% -1.11 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.7 -0.37
27 2012 1908 155.9 +1.50 +1.16 1.059 50.9% +21 -225 +14 56.4% +0.32 9–6 (60%) 13–10 (57%) 101.4 -1.33 2013 1731 143.6 -2.58 +2.05 0.978 50.0% +2 -95 -37 48.9% +0.08 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 102.2 -0.29
28 2013 1806 154.0 +1.07 -0.98 0.959 49.3% +63 -182 +5 43.6% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 6–13 (32%) 86.4 -2.69 2014 1669 132.2 -3.08 -1.17 0.873 48.0% -24 -5 +60 42.6% -0.69 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.9 +0.69
29 2014 1705 123.0 -0.60 -0.13 0.951 48.8% +34 — +84 46.8% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.23 2015 1583 117.3 -3.20 +0.43 0.825 46.0% -7 — — 25.0% -1.69 1–1 1–1 — -0.03
30 2015 1870 152.8 -0.76 +2.30 1.033 50.6% -3 -251 -6 56.9% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 11–9 (55%) 105.0 -0.74 2016 1707 126.4 -2.95 +1.32 0.953 49.2% -8 — — 47.8% -0.17 1–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.76
31 2016 1884 158.0 +0.22 +1.50 1.027 50.2% +24 -227 -33 52.5% +0.08 6–7 (46%) 12–10 (55%) 100.2 -2.18 2017 1618 113.4 +0.68 +0.45 1.108 51.9% — — +97 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10
32 2017 1839 144.1 +0.48 -0.05 1.011 50.1% +31 -215 -34 52.1% +0.15 6–1 (86%) 6–6 (50%) 104.3 -0.55 2018 1543 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1728 136.9 +0.05 +0.78 1.058 50.5% +55 -175 +46 43.8% -0.13 3–4 (43%) 7–8 (47%) 96.1 +0.39 2019 1567 110.3 -0.77 -0.97 0.651 42.8% — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — -0.04
34 2019 1743 122.7 -0.99 +0.40 1.010 49.8% +39 — — 50.0% -0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.56 2020 1532 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1492 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1515 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1953 157.5 +0.97 +1.47 1.049 50.7% +23 -204 +4 54.6% +0.27 95–94 (50%) 147–125 (54%) 100.7 -1.90 — 1766 131.0 -2.90 +1.13 0.926 48.7% -32 -76 +38 42.4% -0.48 12–30 (29%) 21–28 (43%) 91.3 +0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.