H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Marcos Baghdatis vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 2-0
Marcos Baghdatis holds a 2–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2013 Zagreb third round 6-7(6) 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2013* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| May 3, 2012* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcos Baghdatis | Tobias Kamke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |