H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Marcos Giron vs Dusan Lajovic
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marcos Giron vs Dusan Lajovic.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 32
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Giron | #87 | #37 | 1,265 | 1,916 | 137 | 160 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcos Giron | Dusan Lajovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #308 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #66 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #60 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2025 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #65 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #87 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |