H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcos Giron vs Jack Sock H2H: 1-0
Marcos Giron holds a 1–0 lead over Jack Sock in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcos Giron leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Giron won the 2020 New York third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 32
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2020* | New York | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marcos Giron | 6-3 6-4 | Jack Sock | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Giron | #87 | #37 | 1,265 | 1,916 | 137 | 160 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcos Giron | Jack Sock | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #308 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2020 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2021 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #66 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2023 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #60 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2025 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #65 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #87 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |