H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marcos Giron vs Milos Raonic H2H: 0-2
Milos Raonic holds a 2–0 lead over Marcos Giron in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2020 Paris Masters fourth round 7-6(1) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 32
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2020* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 7-6(1) 6-2 | Marcos Giron | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2019* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Marcos Giron | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Giron | #87 | #37 | 1,265 | 1,916 | 137 | 160 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcos Giron | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #308 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2020 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2021 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #66 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2023 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #60 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2025 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #65 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #87 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |