H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mardy Fish vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-0

Mardy Fish holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mardy Fish leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2011 Memphis round of 16 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mardy Fish #17 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(3) Lukas Lacko #109 Match data Feb 18, 2011* R16 Memphis ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,116 295 212 58.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mardy Fish Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2004 26–18 59.1% #37 1,760 0 1 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,640 0 1 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,726 0 2 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,755 0 2 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,860 0 2 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,815 0 3 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,023 0 5 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,012 0 6 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,935 0 6 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
33 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,885 0 6 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mardy Fish Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 29 12 41 70.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2004 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 12 14 26 46.2% 5 0 5 100.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2007 22 14 36 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 26 15 41 63.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2009 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2010 25 11 36 69.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2011 33 17 50 66.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2012 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2013 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 221 151 372 59.4% 24 29 53 45.3% 46 26 72 63.9% 4 6 10 40.0% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/465 of Mardy Fish's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mardy Fish Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2003 58/61 11.0 3.9 53.4% 80.0% 52.0% 64.2% 39.2% 67.0% 35.1% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2004 38/44 11.1 4.1 55.1% 77.2% 50.8% 65.1% 42.1% 65.4% 35.2% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2005 17/17 10.3 3.4 53.9% 72.8% 46.5% 53.7% 34.0% 60.9% 34.2% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2006 40/41 9.5 3.1 51.8% 78.8% 53.9% 68.1% 43.9% 66.5% 37.5% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2007 45/45 11.4 2.7 52.2% 80.1% 52.1% 55.7% 42.6% 66.5% 35.7% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2008 55/55 10.1 2.7 49.3% 77.9% 51.8% 57.6% 39.2% 64.6% 36.6% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2009 37/38 11.0 2.3 56.9% 77.1% 53.3% 58.2% 44.0% 66.6% 36.9% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2010 52/53 10.9 2.3 55.3% 79.7% 54.6% 62.1% 49.8% 68.5% 38.1% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2011 64/64 7.6 1.7 58.4% 76.7% 55.4% 64.9% 44.7% 67.7% 39.4% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2012 31/32 9.7 2.5 52.2% 77.9% 55.4% 68.6% 51.3% 67.1% 39.8% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2013 9/9 5.8 3.1 49.6% 75.7% 47.6% 45.0% 44.4% 61.2% 37.2% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
33 2015 6/6 8.3 3.8 52.2% 75.4% 46.3% 54.9% 43.2% 61.5% 40.9% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
Career — 452/507 10.0 2.8 53.9% 78.1% 52.8% 61.7% 43.4% 66.3% 37.1% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mardy Fish Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1524 106.9 — — — — -10 — +79 35.3% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.29 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1543 124.2 — — — — +34 — +26 37.8% -0.54 5–4 (56%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.58 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2002 1630 123.4 — — — — +7 — -44 47.4% -0.32 4–3 (57%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.37 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2003 1841 146.3 +3.97 -0.87 1.064 50.8% +36 -346 -162 57.3% +0.28 15–8 (65%) 18–18 (50%) — -0.62 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2004 1761 139.2 +1.62 -0.32 1.019 50.7% +14 — -26 54.0% +0.36 12–5 (71%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.83 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2005 1641 122.4 -1.17 -0.67 0.875 47.6% +31 — — 34.9% -0.84 4–0 (100%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.38 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2006 1727 137.0 +3.82 +0.31 1.121 52.1% -53 -159 +51 54.8% +0.55 6–5 (55%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.33 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2007 1756 144.3 +2.76 +0.38 1.067 51.0% +30 -208 -75 50.5% +0.02 8–6 (57%) 11–13 (46%) — +0.23 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2008 1861 148.1 +1.58 +0.64 1.033 50.7% +50 -274 -175 56.0% +0.36 10–6 (63%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.64 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2009 1816 145.3 +2.33 +0.49 1.105 51.8% +26 -197 -21 55.3% +0.47 5–8 (38%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.08 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2010 2023 156.7 +4.21 +2.02 1.209 53.0% +22 -393 -76 67.2% +0.98 10–6 (63%) 20–5 (80%) — +0.51 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2011 2012 168.6 +4.73 +3.34 1.217 53.5% +6 -303 +46 64.1% +0.86 10–8 (56%) 14–10 (58%) — +1.88 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2012 2013 152.5 +3.05 +2.62 1.209 53.3% +23 — +55 61.5% +0.88 5–2 (71%) 8–8 (50%) — +2.93 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2013 1936 131.0 -1.70 +0.61 0.959 49.0% +18 — — 45.0% -0.10 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.20 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1885 133.8 -0.64 +1.74 1.060 51.0% +16 — — 44.4% +0.61 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.26 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2116 154.2 +2.92 +0.94 1.100 51.7% +19 -269 -43 55.6% +0.38 99–65 (60%) 107–118 (48%) 103.9 +1.17 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.