H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mariano Zabaleta vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 0-1
Daniel Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Mariano Zabaleta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1999 Miami Masters first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1999* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-4 6-4 | Mariano Zabaleta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariano Zabaleta | #1,009 | #21 | 1,426 | 1,878 | 199 | 206 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mariano Zabaleta | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #103 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #28 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #61 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #53 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #27 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #54 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1141 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |