H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 4-3

Marin Cilic holds a 4–3 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2021 Murray River Open second round 2-6 6-3 7-6(8).

Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 3, 2021* Murray River Open ATP 250 R64 Hard Jeremy Chardy #66 2-6 6-3 7-6(8) Marin Cilic #43 Match data
Oct 19, 2019* Moscow ATP 250 QF Hard Marin Cilic #25 6-4 4-6 7-6(2) Jeremy Chardy #66 Match data
Apr 19, 2017* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Marin Cilic #8 6-3 6-0 Jeremy Chardy #71 Match data
Mar 25, 2017* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jeremy Chardy #77 6-4 2-6 6-3 Marin Cilic #9 Match data
Sep 8, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Marin Cilic #9 6-3 2-6 7-6(2) 6-1 Jeremy Chardy #27 Match data
Jul 1, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Marin Cilic #29 7-6(8) 6-4 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #43 Match data
May 9, 2009* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Jeremy Chardy #40 3-6 7-5 6-4 Marin Cilic #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21