H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marin Cilic vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 6-3
Marin Cilic holds a 6–3 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2014 Rome Masters third round 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
6
–
3
9 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 45
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2014* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jurgen Melzer | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2013* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-3 6-1 | Jurgen Melzer | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2011* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-2 6-4 | Jurgen Melzer | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2010* | Dubai | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Jurgen Melzer | 7-6(8) 7-5 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Feb 6, 2010* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Marin Cilic | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Jurgen Melzer | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2009* | Vienna | ATP 500 | F | Hard | Jurgen Melzer | 6-4 6-3 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2008* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 5-7 6-4 7-5 | Jurgen Melzer | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2008* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Marin Cilic | 7-6(2) 7-6(5) | Jurgen Melzer | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-4 6-3 6-4 | Jurgen Melzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marin Cilic | #88 | #3 | 5,155 | 2,195 | 572 | 344 | 62.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 21 |
| Jurgen Melzer | #1,552 | #8 | 3,055 | 2,024 | 326 | 303 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marin Cilic | Jurgen Melzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #491 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #358 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 45–20 | 69.2% | #14 | 1,989 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,854 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,963 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #15 | 2,009 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #37 | 1,964 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #52 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #9 | 2,127 | 1 | 13 | 2006 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #41 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 2,061 | 1 | 14 | 2007 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #6 | 2,133 | 1 | 16 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #34 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 2,055 | 1 | 17 | 2009 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #28 | 1,924 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #7 | 2,056 | 1 | 18 | 2010 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,998 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,911 | 1 | 18 | 2011 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,850 | 1 | 18 | 2012 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #29 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #30 | 1,933 | 1 | 20 | 2013 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #27 | 1,825 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2022 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,958 | 1 | 20 | 2014 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #113 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #672 | 1,912 | 1 | 20 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #155 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2024 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #179 | 1,816 | 1 | 21 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #306 | 1,770 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2025 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,819 | 1 | 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | 2026 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,758 | 1 | 21 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |