H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 6-3

Marin Cilic holds a 6–3 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2014 Rome Masters third round 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3.

Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
6 3
9 main draw meetings
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 14, 2014* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Jurgen Melzer #67 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 Marin Cilic #26 Match data
Feb 10, 2013* Zagreb ATP 250 F Hard Marin Cilic #12 6-3 6-1 Jurgen Melzer #29 Match data
Feb 11, 2011* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Marin Cilic #28 6-2 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #11 Match data
Feb 26, 2010* Dubai ATP 500 QF Hard Jurgen Melzer #31 7-6(8) 7-5 Marin Cilic #9 Match data
Feb 6, 2010* Zagreb ATP 250 SF Hard Marin Cilic #10 7-6(5) 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #32 Match data
Nov 1, 2009* Vienna ATP 500 F Hard Jurgen Melzer #35 6-4 6-3 Marin Cilic #13 Match data
Aug 21, 2008* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Marin Cilic #31 5-7 6-4 7-5 Jurgen Melzer #48 Match data
Jun 11, 2008* Queen's Club ATP 500 R64 Grass Marin Cilic #56 7-6(2) 7-6(5) Jurgen Melzer #81 Match data
Jan 17, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Marin Cilic #57 6-4 6-3 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5