H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Milos Raonic H2H: 3-2

Marin Cilic holds a 3–2 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Marin Cilic leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2020 Australian Open fourth round 6-4 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Milos Raonic
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 29, 2020* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Milos Raonic #35 6-4 6-3 7-5 Marin Cilic #39 Match data
Apr 20, 2018* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Marin Cilic #3 (w/o) Milos Raonic #22 Match data
May 7, 2017* Istanbul ATP 250 F Clay Marin Cilic #8 7-6(3) 6-3 Milos Raonic #6 Match data
Mar 12, 2013* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Milos Raonic #17 3-6 6-4 6-3 Marin Cilic #12 Match data
Nov 3, 2011* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Hard Marin Cilic #20 6-4 6-4 Milos Raonic #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,246 369 186 66.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Milos Raonic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,839 0 1
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2012 42–20 67.7% #13 1,987 0 3
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,034 0 5
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,087 0 6
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,047 0 7
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,143 0 8
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,053 0 8
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,952 0 8
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,919 0 8
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 1,996 0 8
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,964 0 8
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 — — — — — — —
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,909 0 8
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2024 6–5 54.5% #238 1,903 0 8
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 — — — — — — —
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 — — — — — — —
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 — — — — — — —
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 — — — — — — —