H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 0-1

Pablo Cuevas holds a 1–0 lead over Marin Cilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2019 Budapest round of 16 5-7 7-6(6) 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Cuevas #73 5-7 7-6(6) 7-6(3) Marin Cilic #11 Match data Apr 26, 2019* R16 Budapest ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marin Cilic #81 #3 5,155 2,199 578 350 62.3% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 212 213 49.9% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Pablo Cuevas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 37–24 60.7% #23 1,908 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,991 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,856 0 5 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,966 0 6 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,633 0 0
23 2012 38–18 67.9% #15 2,004 0 8 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,745 0 0
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 2,005 0 9 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,130 1 13 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,064 1 14 — — — — — — —
27 2016 44–21 67.7% #6 2,135 1 16 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,716 0 0
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,843 0 2
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,053 1 18 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,912 1 18 2016 34–23 59.6% #22 1,810 0 5
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,841 1 18 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,787 0 6
32 2021 32–19 62.7% #30 1,928 1 20 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,953 1 20 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,741 0 6
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,933 1 20 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,827 1 21 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,825 1 21 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6
37 2026 14–16 46.7% #81 1,748 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marin Cilic Pablo Cuevas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 25 15 40 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 34 13 47 72.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 28 14 42 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 25 14 39 64.1% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — — — — —
23 2012 14 10 24 58.3% 15 6 21 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2013 14 6 20 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2014 37 13 50 74.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — —
26 2015 21 10 31 67.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 34 16 50 68.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2017 19 15 34 55.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2015 8 13 21 38.1% 19 9 28 67.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2019 15 13 28 53.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 21 8 29 72.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
31 2020 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 6 11 17 35.3% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2021 18 12 30 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2018 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2022 20 14 34 58.8% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
35 2024 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 3 3 6 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 2025 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
37 2026 9 8 17 52.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 362 218 580 62.4% 128 91 219 58.4% 84 37 121 69.4% 4 4 8 50.0% — 56 86 142 39.4% 149 116 265 56.2% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 909/929 of Marin Cilic's and 421/425 of Pablo Cuevas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marin Cilic Pablo Cuevas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2005 1/1 2.0 2.0 50.8% 56.3% 45.2% 20.0% 50.0% 50.8% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 14/14 5.4 3.5 54.6% 69.3% 48.4% 59.9% 29.1% 59.6% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 24/24 7.0 3.5 52.6% 74.3% 48.5% 57.9% 51.0% 62.1% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 59/61 9.3 3.3 53.6% 75.6% 53.2% 60.5% 38.4% 65.3% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 65/65 7.8 2.7 56.6% 75.5% 53.6% 61.0% 38.2% 66.3% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 59/59 7.2 2.5 58.1% 74.6% 53.5% 66.4% 43.0% 65.7% 38.0% 2007 1/1 1.0 5.0 43.6% 50.0% 40.9% 58.8% 14.3% 44.9% 34.6%
22 2011 62/63 7.0 2.6 54.7% 76.4% 54.7% 59.1% 44.6% 66.8% 38.3% 2008 21/21 4.1 1.9 59.3% 63.2% 54.4% 55.2% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1%
23 2012 54/56 6.2 2.7 55.5% 72.4% 53.2% 53.2% 46.7% 64.0% 40.4% 2009 33/33 7.5 2.2 63.6% 72.0% 51.8% 60.2% 47.4% 64.8% 34.6%
24 2013 36/37 8.4 2.4 56.4% 76.9% 57.0% 62.5% 43.3% 68.1% 38.6% 2010 41/42 4.7 2.2 61.6% 68.2% 47.5% 50.4% 40.6% 60.3% 37.2%
25 2014 71/72 10.4 2.8 56.9% 79.0% 50.9% 67.0% 39.5% 66.9% 38.0% 2011 24/24 5.4 1.7 59.8% 72.3% 56.0% 58.0% 41.2% 65.9% 37.8%
26 2015 54/54 12.0 2.6 58.8% 77.6% 52.0% 63.8% 41.8% 67.0% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 62/65 10.4 2.4 55.4% 80.1% 54.7% 59.5% 40.4% 68.9% 37.1% 2013 6/6 5.8 4.0 57.6% 69.0% 46.5% 67.5% 32.5% 59.5% 31.7%
28 2017 64/65 11.3 3.1 58.5% 79.9% 54.9% 60.5% 42.7% 69.6% 39.7% 2014 29/29 5.7 3.1 60.1% 72.0% 52.7% 47.6% 37.7% 64.2% 39.5%
29 2018 58/59 10.2 3.1 58.8% 80.1% 55.1% 57.3% 40.3% 69.9% 38.1% 2015 53/53 5.8 2.8 60.5% 71.4% 52.5% 64.8% 42.6% 63.7% 37.5%
30 2019 41/42 9.7 5.0 58.3% 77.4% 47.7% 61.0% 41.9% 65.1% 35.0% 2016 55/57 7.6 2.9 60.3% 75.8% 55.2% 62.3% 42.7% 67.5% 36.5%
31 2020 21/22 10.0 3.8 59.8% 76.2% 50.1% 61.4% 33.4% 65.6% 35.7% 2017 41/41 5.3 3.6 59.0% 72.6% 51.0% 59.7% 42.4% 63.7% 36.3%
32 2021 49/51 11.1 3.9 58.2% 79.0% 49.9% 62.9% 38.5% 66.6% 37.0% 2018 27/27 6.2 3.3 60.2% 74.3% 55.2% 57.1% 37.9% 66.4% 36.6%
33 2022 51/52 11.5 3.4 59.9% 78.9% 52.2% 61.1% 41.2% 68.0% 38.0% 2019 45/45 5.5 3.0 58.9% 74.2% 52.7% 54.8% 44.8% 65.5% 36.2%
34 2023 2/3 9.5 3.0 65.4% 71.9% 42.9% 64.6% 21.4% 62.6% 33.9% 2020 17/17 5.9 3.5 60.3% 70.5% 49.4% 60.5% 33.6% 62.2% 35.6%
35 2024 14/14 12.1 4.0 56.2% 77.9% 50.3% 59.7% 54.3% 65.8% 33.3% 2021 20/20 4.8 2.5 68.9% 70.3% 50.2% 58.6% 43.1% 63.8% 35.6%
36 2025 19/19 8.7 2.8 57.0% 75.5% 50.9% 55.9% 35.8% 64.8% 30.6% 2022 8/9 2.8 1.9 66.8% 67.4% 53.2% 60.2% 47.2% 63.3% 37.4%
37 2026 29/31 9.1 3.2 58.6% 76.8% 48.4% 61.5% 37.2% 65.2% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 909/929 9.3 3.0 57.0% 77.1% 52.6% 60.9% 41.2% 66.6% 37.6% — 421/425 5.8 2.8 60.8% 71.7% 52.3% 58.1% 41.6% 64.1% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marin Cilic Pablo Cuevas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2005 1486 99.9 -3.62 -1.03 0.677 42.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1498 111.3 -1.65 -2.46 0.850 47.4% -25 +64 — 37.1% -0.77 4–3 (57%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1715 126.8 -0.80 -0.10 0.954 49.3% -39 -98 -126 47.5% -0.11 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1908 151.0 +2.06 +1.34 1.082 51.4% -11 -243 -142 57.3% +0.46 10–8 (56%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 1992 159.4 +3.31 +2.77 1.188 52.7% +28 -214 -200 64.9% +1.04 13–8 (62%) 14–16 (47%) — +2.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 1857 158.2 +2.35 +1.40 1.109 51.8% +72 +14 -102 58.6% +0.73 13–5 (72%) 11–19 (37%) — +1.24 2007 1551 110.8 +3.13 +0.76 0.628 39.7% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.20
22 2011 1966 162.8 +4.08 +1.86 1.156 52.2% +25 -52 -198 59.6% +0.62 12–7 (63%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.09 2008 1633 124.3 -1.73 -1.88 0.867 47.8% +1 -44 — 37.5% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.48
23 2012 2005 160.0 +1.42 +3.57 1.123 52.2% -30 +11 -22 62.0% +0.74 8–3 (73%) 11–15 (42%) — +1.95 2009 1745 137.5 +0.89 -2.33 0.983 50.1% -71 +96 — 55.4% +0.08 6–6 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — +1.03
24 2013 2005 157.1 +3.69 +2.41 1.208 52.9% +18 -88 +81 63.4% +0.90 8–5 (62%) 11–4 (73%) — +0.69 2010 1761 136.7 -1.96 -0.08 0.937 48.6% -45 +38 — 48.9% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 15–2 (88%) — +0.76
25 2014 2130 169.3 +3.49 +2.72 1.150 52.3% +34 -173 -10 65.8% +0.76 13–9 (59%) 20–9 (69%) — -2.53 2011 1743 138.9 +2.31 +0.26 1.110 51.3% -28 +9 — 52.6% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.08
26 2015 2064 160.5 +3.04 +1.34 1.114 51.7% +53 -93 +78 60.4% +0.54 12–8 (60%) 26–9 (74%) — +1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 2136 171.9 +5.19 +1.67 1.193 52.6% +11 -180 +58 63.1% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.16 2013 1717 114.3 -1.40 -3.04 0.783 46.7% -23 — — 43.8% -1.13 1–1 1–1 — +0.05
28 2017 2055 166.2 +4.81 +4.38 1.303 53.9% -89 -3 +181 63.1% +0.91 10–12 (45%) 16–14 (53%) — +0.86 2014 1843 147.6 +0.35 +2.31 1.103 51.7% -117 +98 — 54.7% +0.27 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.40
29 2018 2054 170.8 +5.78 +3.23 1.264 53.3% -14 +7 +214 64.3% +0.99 9–10 (47%) 20–18 (53%) — -0.29 2015 1815 156.3 +0.03 +1.37 1.032 50.7% -98 +211 -198 50.7% +0.06 9–11 (45%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.40
30 2019 1912 154.6 +1.14 -0.18 1.003 50.4% +27 +85 +277 54.5% +0.15 5–6 (45%) 16–9 (64%) — +1.07 2016 1810 152.1 +3.77 +0.09 1.125 51.7% -111 +203 -133 57.5% +0.44 12–10 (55%) 19–20 (49%) — +2.40
31 2020 1842 146.2 +1.45 -0.54 1.037 50.2% +6 +126 — 45.5% -0.05 7–4 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.50 2017 1788 154.1 +0.80 -0.10 0.998 49.9% -91 +130 — 47.6% -0.14 9–7 (56%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.79
32 2021 1929 146.3 +3.33 +0.85 1.108 51.7% -35 +4 +247 57.9% +0.43 13–8 (62%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.01 2018 1767 142.3 +1.63 +0.47 1.090 51.2% -24 +67 — 47.0% +0.24 4–4 (50%) 6–14 (30%) — +0.81
33 2022 1953 160.1 +4.07 +1.98 1.190 52.7% -43 +52 +215 60.6% +0.86 8–10 (44%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.30 2019 1741 144.0 +1.27 -0.02 1.050 50.6% -34 +106 -89 49.1% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.69
34 2023 1933 104.1 +0.22 +0.03 0.907 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 — — +0.03 2020 1692 131.9 -0.42 -0.37 0.941 48.8% -54 +121 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.62
35 2024 1827 133.0 +0.92 -0.98 0.975 50.1% -8 — — 45.7% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.06 2021 1652 127.3 +0.69 -1.10 0.984 49.6% -2 +108 — 45.1% -0.25 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.71
36 2025 1825 142.2 +1.69 -2.10 0.870 48.1% +3 — +327 43.1% -0.45 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.90 2022 1654 112.6 +0.30 -1.95 1.017 50.8% — +63 — 41.7% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.50
37 2026 1748 138.1 +0.72 +0.13 1.005 50.1% +67 0 +278 48.6% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.87 2023 1612 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1580 89.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2200 164.7 +3.06 +1.77 1.127 51.9% +6 -47 +77 59.1% +0.60 170–127 (57%) 230–214 (52%) 99.2 +0.53 — 1960 148.4 +0.77 -0.05 1.019 50.3% -70 +102 -143 49.9% -0.03 68–74 (48%) 100–95 (51%) 98.5 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.