H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Marinko Matosevic vs Ruben Bemelmans H2H: 1-1
Marinko Matosevic and Ruben Bemelmans are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruben Bemelmans won the 2015 Washington second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 38
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2015* | Washington | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Ruben Bemelmans | 6-3 6-3 | Marinko Matosevic | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2012* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Marinko Matosevic | 6-2 6-3 | Ruben Bemelmans | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2009 | US Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Ruben Bemelmans | 6-3 (ret.) | Marinko Matosevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marinko Matosevic | #509 | #39 | 955 | 1,900 | 62 | 92 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruben Bemelmans | #1,092 | #84 | 628 | 1,755 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marinko Matosevic | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #203 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #108 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #75 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #296 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #117 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |