H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Albert Montanes H2H: 1-0
Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 Roland Garros third round 6-1 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Mario Ancic | 6-1 6-2 6-4 | Albert Montanes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Albert Montanes | #335 | #22 | 1,770 | 1,920 | 257 | 287 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Albert Montanes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #65 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #78 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #99 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #45 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #31 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #53 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #96 | 1,634 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #164 | 1,637 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #335 | 1,612 | 0 | 6 |