H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Alex Corretja H2H: 1-0
Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2004 Australian Open second round 6-4 1-6 6-3 6-7(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-4 1-6 6-3 6-7(4) 7-5 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Alex Corretja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 |