H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Alexander Waske H2H: 2-0
Mario Ancic holds a 2–0 lead over Alexander Waske in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 Hamburg Masters second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2006* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mario Ancic | 6-2 7-5 | Alexander Waske | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-3 6-4 7-6(4) | Alexander Waske | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Alexander Waske | #571 | #89 | 455 | 1,629 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Alexander Waske | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #122 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #157 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #122 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #109 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #242 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |