H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 2-0
Mario Ancic holds a 2–0 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Mario Ancic | 6-4 6-2 6-1 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2006* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-3 7-6(3) | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Davide Sanguinetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |