H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 2-0

Mario Ancic holds a 2–0 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 Wimbledon round of 64 6-4 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mario Ancic
CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Davide Sanguinetti
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mario Ancic #10 6-4 6-2 6-1 Davide Sanguinetti #69 Match data Jun 30, 2006* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Mario Ancic #23 6-3 7-6(3) Davide Sanguinetti #51 Match data Mar 8, 2006* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 125 60.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Davide Sanguinetti #1,080 #42 874 1,772 157 233 40.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Davide Sanguinetti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 26–22 54.2% #29 1,725 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,799 0 1 1994 0–2 0.0% #177 1,482 0 0
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 1995 0–3 0.0% #290 1,455 0 0
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,881 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,925 0 3 1997 5–11 31.2% #95 1,497 0 0
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,917 0 3 1998 29–27 51.8% #48 1,675 0 0
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,876 0 3 1999 8–23 25.8% #120 1,560 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 17–21 44.7% #65 1,638 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 10–27 27.0% #91 1,530 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 22–21 51.2% #46 1,621 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2003 16–21 43.2% #65 1,620 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2004 11–20 35.5% #110 1,591 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2005 25–25 50.0% #44 1,709 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2006 9–24 27.3% #107 1,547 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2007 5–8 38.5% #270 1,519 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mario Ancic Davide Sanguinetti
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2006 24 11 35 68.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
25 2009 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 17 16 33 51.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 2 5 7 28.6% 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 13 18 27.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 15 10 25 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 106 78 184 57.6% 32 23 55 58.2% 39 14 53 73.6% 16 10 26 61.5% — 78 100 178 43.8% 45 83 128 35.2% 20 27 47 42.6% 14 23 37 37.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 355/390 of Davide Sanguinetti's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mario Ancic Davide Sanguinetti
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 8/10 7.0 6.0 49.1% 75.0% 44.7% 54.2% 29.0% 59.8% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 32/32 8.4 4.3 57.9% 72.2% 51.0% 55.3% 38.5% 63.0% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 47/48 9.5 3.2 62.3% 75.9% 55.0% 45.1% 40.3% 67.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 65/65 11.3 2.8 61.8% 79.5% 52.0% 62.9% 46.7% 68.9% 37.4% 1994 2/2 5.0 4.0 40.8% 71.3% 40.4% 63.5% 27.5% 52.8% 41.3%
22 2006 70/70 9.1 2.0 62.7% 75.5% 53.5% 64.7% 44.0% 67.2% 37.3% 1995 3/3 5.3 1.7 59.9% 74.9% 43.9% 41.3% 5.6% 62.5% 28.3%
23 2007 23/23 8.3 1.7 63.5% 76.8% 53.0% 56.1% 42.7% 68.0% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 45/46 9.2 2.3 62.9% 76.3% 53.6% 64.5% 39.8% 67.7% 37.1% 1997 14/16 5.7 2.4 52.5% 68.6% 45.1% 59.9% 43.6% 57.4% 40.5%
25 2009 19/19 7.6 1.3 60.0% 73.0% 57.8% 59.9% 30.8% 66.6% 37.2% 1998 45/56 5.8 2.8 54.2% 72.2% 46.6% 55.4% 42.9% 60.0% 39.8%
26 2010 5/5 8.0 2.6 59.8% 69.0% 42.0% 50.6% 42.4% 58.0% 31.3% 1999 26/31 4.2 2.5 53.3% 66.6% 46.0% 55.1% 42.2% 56.9% 36.9%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 32/38 7.4 2.7 53.2% 73.9% 47.0% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 38.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 34/37 6.0 3.5 56.1% 69.8% 46.0% 53.6% 39.3% 59.2% 35.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 36/43 6.4 2.6 57.2% 68.2% 48.3% 53.9% 47.0% 59.7% 37.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 36/37 4.5 2.4 58.7% 69.4% 48.3% 59.5% 39.6% 60.5% 36.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 31/31 4.1 2.5 59.6% 66.5% 49.2% 52.1% 37.9% 59.5% 36.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 50/50 5.4 1.6 57.2% 70.8% 49.8% 55.9% 39.5% 61.9% 37.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 33/33 4.9 2.2 57.1% 68.7% 49.6% 54.9% 31.7% 60.6% 34.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 13/13 5.3 2.2 59.4% 67.1% 44.4% 58.0% 39.6% 58.0% 35.1%
Career — 314/318 9.3 2.7 61.5% 76.0% 53.0% 59.0% 41.5% 67.0% 37.2% — 355/390 5.5 2.5 56.2% 69.7% 47.6% 55.6% 40.1% 59.9% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mario Ancic Davide Sanguinetti
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1531 113.3 -1.58 +0.50 0.955 48.9% -13 — +101 37.5% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1622 126.7 +0.21 +0.64 1.003 50.1% -36 -40 -47 46.1% -0.20 6–9 (40%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1725 141.5 +4.07 +1.16 1.178 52.4% -136 -28 +99 54.0% +0.48 6–9 (40%) 7–17 (29%) — -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1799 152.9 +5.24 +0.79 1.202 53.0% -15 -42 +132 64.8% +1.01 5–11 (31%) 18–11 (62%) — +2.76 1994 1483 107.3 -0.36 +1.47 0.876 46.8% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.11
22 2006 1954 149.4 +4.79 +0.38 1.138 52.3% -48 -50 +88 64.1% +0.94 21–2 (91%) 19–14 (58%) — +1.74 1995 1455 106.3 -0.79 -2.82 0.755 45.0% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.04
23 2007 1882 144.6 +3.39 -0.07 1.107 51.5% -14 — — 60.0% +0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 1925 152.1 +4.71 +1.41 1.150 52.1% -36 -23 +173 58.0% +0.59 9–4 (69%) 11–11 (50%) — -4.16 1997 1498 126.0 -1.52 +0.15 0.950 48.9% — +63 — 42.5% -0.65 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.38
25 2009 1918 145.3 +2.66 +1.24 1.114 51.2% +12 — — 55.3% +0.45 6–0 (100%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.19 1998 1676 129.3 -1.67 +1.12 0.996 49.8% -85 -33 +42 51.4% +0.12 7–10 (41%) 8–11 (42%) — +3.09
26 2010 1877 117.6 -1.67 -1.63 0.746 45.6% +37 — — 33.3% -0.83 2–0 1–1 — -0.31 1999 1560 123.1 -3.03 -1.02 0.856 47.3% +21 +5 — 36.1% -0.95 2–10 (17%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.62
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1639 131.0 -0.65 +1.27 0.998 49.8% +4 -99 +25 45.2% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.27
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1530 122.7 -2.53 -2.07 0.871 47.6% -6 -17 +99 34.0% -0.91 5–9 (36%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.78
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1621 139.4 -1.91 +0.49 0.924 48.7% +54 -99 -32 50.0% -0.05 12–7 (63%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.85
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1621 125.3 -1.40 -0.39 0.915 48.5% +60 -134 -67 42.2% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.67
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1591 122.1 -2.81 -0.69 0.891 48.0% +49 -138 -34 41.3% -0.75 4–8 (33%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.44
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1710 134.9 -0.38 -0.85 0.974 49.5% -28 -90 -81 48.5% -0.04 11–6 (65%) 10–12 (45%) — +0.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1548 123.8 -1.74 -1.80 0.880 47.7% +25 +2 +57 34.5% -0.88 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1520 110.9 -3.01 -0.31 0.835 46.7% +46 — — 42.9% -0.43 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.09
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1510 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1493 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2019 150.9 +3.80 +0.75 1.125 51.9% -37 -37 +105 57.8% +0.60 59–40 (60%) 72–76 (49%) 106.1 -0.38 — 1773 132.7 -1.71 -0.37 0.924 48.5% +16 -39 +4 43.2% -0.42 63–75 (46%) 72–95 (43%) 97.4 +1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.