H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Florent Serra H2H: 3-0
Mario Ancic holds a 3–0 lead over Florent Serra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 Rome Masters third round 3-6 7-6(10) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2006* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Mario Ancic | 3-6 7-6(10) 6-0 | Florent Serra | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2006* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 7-6(4) 6-7(11) 6-2 | Florent Serra | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2005* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Florent Serra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Florent Serra | #942 | #36 | 1,371 | 1,816 | 123 | 170 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Florent Serra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #213 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #60 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #65 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #69 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |