H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 0-1
Frank Dancevic holds a 1–0 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frank Dancevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2008 Canada Masters second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2008* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Frank Dancevic | 6-3 6-4 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Frank Dancevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |