H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Marcelo Rios H2H: 1-0
Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Marcelo Rios in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2003 Roland Garros first round 6-1 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Mario Ancic | 6-1 1-0 (ret.) | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Marcelo Rios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 |