H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Oscar Hernandez H2H: 2-0
Mario Ancic holds a 2–0 lead over Oscar Hernandez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2005 Roland Garros second round 4-6 6-1 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Mario Ancic | 4-6 6-1 6-2 6-3 | Oscar Hernandez | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-3 6-2 6-1 | Oscar Hernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Oscar Hernandez | #1,759 | #48 | 1,168 | 1,743 | 65 | 125 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Oscar Hernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #85 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #58 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #68 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #70 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #221 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |