H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Ricardo Mello H2H: 2-1
Mario Ancic holds a 2–1 lead over Ricardo Mello in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2005 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 45
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2005* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-2 6-3 | Ricardo Mello | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2005* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-1 6-4 | Ricardo Mello | Match data |
| Sep 18, 2004* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Ricardo Mello | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ricardo Mello | #1,018 | #50 | 738 | 1,773 | 52 | 87 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Ricardo Mello | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #133 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #71 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #134 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #257 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1018 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |